I retired the first Two Brick Forge because I realised it had numerous fundamental shortcomings that couldn't be rectified.
For a start, the square cavity prevented efficient swirling of the burner flame and the so I got a huge hot spot where the flame hit and not a lot of flame elsewhere. Partly, this was also due to there being no way for hot gasses to pass out the back of the forge, so all the heat went towards the front. I suspect not having a rear port also gave me back-pressure problems and at the very least limited the size of forging I could do. My concept of having a small cavity was right, but trying to bottle up all the heat was wrong.
The other problem was structural. The forge really needed thicker walls for better insulation and a jacket to cushion it from impact and to hold it all together.
So considering the very low investment sunk into the project I decided to start from scratch. Hence, my second generation two brick forge.
Marking Out
I started by marking out as I had done before, but scribed around this lid to make the ends rounded.
Carving Out
This time, I carved the cavity with a home-made crook knife ground from a kitchen melon-carver. It cut nearly as fast as the router and was almost as accurate, but it left a neat little pile of sand instead of the horrendous covering of fine dust that the router left last time. I carved the ports with a junior hacksaw again though, because it seemed to work well.
In this version, I made an additional port at the back of the forge so that the knife blade could poke out the back and I could work on the ricasso. Last time, I could work the tip or the tang, but not much in between.
Making Fitting Depressions
The idea was to make holes that the mortar could bing into.
This was my first minor mistake. I drilled the holes too deep before I countersunk them and had to fill them later with refractory mortar. Ideally I should have only countersunk and not drilled, because the brick is really soft and a deep hole is not necessary anyway. Well, no big deal.
Flaring the Ports
You can see my second mistake here too. I forgot which way round the forge went and stuck a hole in the wrong place. I filled that with mortar too.
What this picture is intended to show is the way I flared the burner ports on the inside and flared the main port to allow better access with tongs or pliers.
You can also see that I sited the burner nozzle much closer to the front opening of the forge than before. If I even angle the flame I can get any part of the billet hot, all the way to the tongs.
I forgot to take pictures of the next step or two in the construction, because I got a bit carried away. I lined the forge cavity and ports with ITC-100 slurry and sealed the forge with refractory mortar.
Then I applied mortar to the sides and to the inside of a sheet of 1/2" kaowool, cut to fit the sides only (not the ends). Then I laid the kaowool on some fine mesh chicken wire, and wrapped the forge in that, with the wire on the outside and the kaowool sandwiched. Finally, I daubed a thick layer of refractory mortar over the kiln in two layers and left it to dry while I ran some errands.
The whole construction process, including parking my car, getting set up and doing it all took under two hours.
Initial Firing With Map-Torch
When I got back to the shop this evening, the shell was pretty dry, and although I really should have left it to dry out overnight, I went and gave it a quick firing to see how it would do and because it would dry quicker warm, anyway. Any bubbles in the refractory shell that I find later will be repaired.
You can see from the picture, when I ran the Map-Torch that I used with the first generation forge, I got a truly roaring flame that swirled all the way around the forge cavity. In fact, when the torch warmed up, and I opened the valve fully, flames were coming out the front and back at least 2-3". That torch really rocks, especially for something screwed on to the top of a gas bottle.
You can see that I needed to make the burner port a bit bigger, but I wanted to test out a new burner and hadn't yet decided the final size.
Map-Torch vs Bernzomatic
The Map is the one on the left. It has a big head and really pumps out those BTUs. A major problem though, is that the venturi induction holes are very close to the tip and that can lead to spluttering if hot combusted gases cycle back through the burner. I had the distinct impression that even when it wasn't spluttering, I wasn't getting the best burn out of my Mapp-gas.
Bernzomatic who make the Mapp-gas also make the torch on the right. The guys in the burner stores seem to reckon that I could get a few hundred more degrees out of this torch. However, on firing it, I found that the flame was only about a quarter to a third the size of the Map-Torch. So while the cone tip temperature might be higher, the forge temperature may not be.
Flame-On With the Bernzomatic
As you can see, the forge is not quite the same raging inferno that it was with the Map-Torch. That's not a big deal, because the Map was a bit monstrous and too much for the forge cavity, really. The cavity is the same size as the first generation forge, but temperature for a given torch power seems to go up a notch or two. Such is the importance of aerodynamics, I suppose.
I'm keen to use this torch, as it has a better regulator, allowing it to burn consistently even inverted; it has a really neat on-off-lock-on button and an automatic starter; not to mention the venturi holes are far away from the tip. It also has a really clever tip that swirls the flame.
As you can see from the picture above, it also gives a nice, even heat to the forge.
Heating a Billet
Considering that the gas flow through the Bernzomatic is much more economical, I was a little surprised to see the billet come up to temperature quicker and reach a hotter maximum temperature. I could have left it in longer, but I'll probably not reach a welding heat and pushing it further would waste gas and the carbon in my steel.
Compare this with the pictures from the first generation forge and you can see a substantial difference.
A more Even Heat
The last forge was really disappointing in its ability to get a large billet up to an even heat. It's not surprising, really, if you remember how concentrated the heat was and how poor the circulation was.
This time, I stuck the whole 5160 test billet in and gave it a minute to come up. You can imagine how happy I was to see the whole billet get like this. I reckon that with a bit of fine tuning of the burner, I can get a nice even heat that would be nice to forge.
...
PS/ Before you ask, yes, I did consider pluging both torches in and/or making a longer, stacked forge. Instead, I found that I could blow the Map-Torch in the front port with only a bit of spluttering. The stacked modular forge is also a possibility, but it would need to take into account the curvature of such a blade, and seeing as I have a good 6" of hot-burning forge cavity, that should provide me with enough hot steel to pound, especially if I play the blade in and out of the forge.
PPS/ I found that the Map-Torch on it own could bring a billet up to a dull red and that's good enough to hammer, so if you can buy one and a Mapp cylinder, you can get started right away while you shop around for fire bricks. The first generation forge was a big step up above this and the second generation forge was half again as big a step in temperature.
PPPS/ What's next? Well, I plan to use this forge for heat treating and for forging small stuff around the shop when I can't be arsed with going up to the roof. I can see a third generation eventually, but I believe I have squeezed most of the performance out of the medium. A bit better insulation would be advantageous, but after all my testing, I could still place my hand on the forge shell without burning myself. I believe the biggest single improvement in forges designed for a Mapp burner the would be to make a standardised hard refractory lining and stick in in a metal shell with plenty of insulation. I have seen pictures of linings like this on the web, but costing hundreds of dollars and am looking into the possibility of home casting high-alumina inner shells.
Any comments or questions?













Reply With Quote






... 


Bookmarks